Clicky

GSI ‘technically and financially viable’

great sea interconnector energy security

The Great Sea Interconnector (GSI) project, set to link Cyprus to Europe, has been confirmed as both technically and financially viable, with a projected cost of €2 billion and substantial EU support. Former finance minister Harris Georgiades emphasizes its importance for energy security and consumer savings, particularly as Cyprus faces growing energy demands amid shifting trends toward electric vehicles and renewable sources.

Is the Great Sea Interconnector (GSI) project viable?

The Great Sea Interconnector (GSI) is both technically and financially viable. It aims to connect Cyprus electrically to Europe, addressing increasing energy demands. With EU approval and subsidies, the project is strategically important and manageable despite technical challenges and geopolitical risks. The cost, capped at €2 billion, is balanced by long-term consumer savings and EU contributions.

Project Overview

The Great Sea Interconnector (GSI), a topic of hot debate and anticipation, has been declared both technically and financially viable. This statement came from the lips of Harris Georgiades, a former finance minister and Disy MP. At a crucial meeting held at the Presidential Palace, the importance of the GSI was discussed, with a focus on the decisive meeting scheduled for the following Tuesday.

The GSI is more than just a project; it’s an ambitious step towards connecting Cyprus electrically to the rest of Europe. Georgiades, while speaking on CyBC radio, emphasized the importance of Cyprus not remaining the sole exception as an unconnected European island state. He also highlighted the advanced stage of technologies enabling such projects, by citing the example of a subsea cable running from Singapore to Australia.

Infrastructure and Energy Security

Delving into the GSI’s significance, Georgiades pointed out the increasing energy demands of the island, especially with the advent of electric vehicles, a shift from fossil fuels for heating, and the rise of data-centric sectors. The project’s EU approval and the €657 million in subsidies are testaments to its feasibility and strategic importance in light of the island’s precarious geopolitical situation.

Despite concerns regarding the project’s technical challenges, Georgiades reassured that the depth of the waters and the cable’s length are surmountable obstacles. The partnership’s stakeholders, including Greece and the EU, have committed financially, which reflects their confidence in the project. Addressing geopolitical risks, Georgiades reasoned that Greek consumers and the EU would not have invested in the GSI if the risks were not well-assessed and manageable.

Financial Implications and Consumer Impact

The financial aspect of GSI is critical, with an estimated cost of €2 billion regarded as the “absolute max,” according to Georgiades. This cost pales in comparison to the annual €2.5 billion spent on imported fossil fuels. He further detailed that the consumer’s burden would be offset by EU subsidies and contributions from Greek consumers, with payments spread over 35 years.

Georgiades tackled concerns about potential increases in electricity prices and the monopolistic fears by explaining that the regulatory agency (Cera) would have the authority to regulate and distribute the imported energy accordingly. He reassured that the project is not only viable but will also result in consumer savings, contrary to fears of it being overly profitable to certain entities.

Next Steps and Coordination

With the Monday meeting led by President Nikos Christodoulides, the stage is set for coordinating all involved agencies before the crucial stakeholder meeting. This meeting will include key ministers, representatives from the European Commission, project promoters, and the legal service. The focus is to align perspectives and ensure that the project advances with clarity.

As for the much-discussed cost-benefit analyses, Georgiades welcomes additional studies but maintains that the project’s advantages are evident and should not be delayed. The collective goal is to bring the GSI to fruition, enhancing the energy security and economic stability of Cyprus for decades to come.

“`markdown

Is the Great Sea Interconnector (GSI) project viable?

Yes, the Great Sea Interconnector (GSI) project has been confirmed as both technically and financially viable. With a projected cost of €2 billion and substantial EU support, it aims to connect Cyprus electrically to Europe, addressing increasing energy demands. The project is strategically important and manageable despite potential technical challenges and geopolitical risks.

What is the projected cost of the GSI and how will it impact consumers?

The estimated cost of the Great Sea Interconnector (GSI) is capped at €2 billion, which is significantly lower than the annual €2.5 billion Cyprus currently spends on imported fossil fuels. With the backing of €657 million in EU subsidies and contributions from Greek consumers, the financial burden on consumers is expected to be reduced. Payments for the project will be spread over 35 years, aiming to enhance consumer savings in the long run.

How does the GSI address energy security in Cyprus?

The GSI is critical for enhancing energy security in Cyprus as it responds to the island’s growing energy demands driven by the increasing adoption of electric vehicles and a shift towards renewable energy sources. Former finance minister Harris Georgiades noted that the project would ensure that Cyprus is no longer the only unconnected European island state, thereby integrating it into the broader European energy network.

What are the next steps for the GSI project?

Following a key meeting led by President Nikos Christodoulides, stakeholders are set to coordinate efforts to advance the GSI project. This includes discussions among key ministers, representatives from the European Commission, project promoters, and the legal service to align perspectives and ensure clarity for future actions. Georgiades has welcomed further cost-benefit analyses but emphasizes that the project’s advantages are evident and should not be delayed.
“`

About The Author

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top